mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain.git
synced 2026-07-31 04:07:52 +00:00
a4cdb41b0771efde56ef9bd5e42085a6dd45ffde
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
05aec3feb8 |
feat(eval): Day 5 — agent adapter + judge with structured evidence contract
Two modules that together wire Cat 8 / Cat 9 / Cat 5 end-to-end scoring. **eval/runner/judge.ts** — Haiku 4.5 via tool-use `score_answer`. Input is the structured JudgeEvidence contract (fix #16 from the plan's codex review): probe + final_answer_text + evidence_refs + tool_call_summary + ground_truth_pages + rubric. Raw tool output NEVER reaches the judge — that's the Section-3 defense against paraphrased prompt-injection payloads in gold/poison.json. Retry policy: one retry on malformed tool_use response. If the second attempt is still malformed, score the probe as `judge_failed` (all scores 0, verdict=fail) so the run still completes. Aggregation: weighted mean across rubric criteria. Canonical thresholds (pass ≥3.5, partial 2.5-3.5, fail <2.5) — judge can propose a verdict but the computed verdict from the weighted mean is what the scorecard records. This prevents the model from inflating or deflating its own verdict. Score values are clamped to 0-5 on parse even if the model returns out of range. `assertNoRawToolOutput(evidence)` is a regression guard that returns the list of forbidden fields (tool_result, raw_transcript, etc.) if any leak into the evidence contract. **eval/runner/adapters/claude-sonnet-with-tools.ts** — The agent adapter. Implements `Adapter` interface minimally: `init()` spins up PGLite and seeds it, `query()` throws because the adapter is Cat 8/9-only and emits a final-answer text, not a RankedDoc[]. Retrieval scorecard stays at 4 adapters. `runAgentLoop(probeId, text, state, config)` drives the multi-turn loop: Sonnet → tool_use → tool-bridge.executeTool → tool_result → back to Sonnet. Turn cap 10. max_tokens 1024. System prompt (brain-first iron law, citation format, amara context) is cached via cache_control. Exponential backoff on rate-limit errors (1s, 2s, 4s). Emits a `Transcript` per eval/schemas/transcript.schema.json — consumed directly by recorder.ts for the flight-recorder bundle. `brain_first_ordering` classifies Cat 8's flagship metric: did the agent call search/get_page BEFORE producing the final answer? The `no_brain_calls` case (agent answers from general knowledge without ever hitting the brain) is the compliance failure to surface. ForbiddenOpError + UnknownToolError from the bridge are caught in the agent loop and surfaced as tool_result with is_error=true — keeps the loop going and preserves full audit trail for the judge. **Tests (35 new):** judge (23) — happy path, retry, fallback, evidence contract sanitization, rendered prompt does not contain raw tool_result text, verdict thresholds, score clamping, weighted mean with mixed weights, parseToolUse rejects malformed input. agent-adapter (12) — Adapter.query() throws, init() seeds PGLite, end-to-end tool loop with stubbed Sonnet, turn cap exhaustion, mutating-op rejection surfaces as tool_result error, extractSlugs regex. All 12 agent tests take ~23s because PGLite runs 13 schema migrations per test; the alternative of shared-engine-across-tests was rejected so each test is isolated. Total eval suite now: 167 pass, 0 fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
c6b308a1c8 |
fix(eval): teardown PGLite engines so bun run eval:run exits 0
The multi-adapter runner left PGLite engines alive after each run. GbrainAfterAdapter and HybridNoGraphAdapter both instantiate a PGLiteEngine in init() but never disconnect it; Bun's shutdown path exits with code 99 when embedded-Postgres workers outlive main(). Added optional `teardown?(state)` to the Adapter interface, implemented it on both engine-backed adapters, and call it from scoreOneRun after the N=5 loop. ripgrep-bm25 and vector-only hold no DB resources and don't need a teardown. Verified: gbrain-after, hybrid-nograph, ripgrep-bm25, vector-only all exit 0 at N=1. Full test:eval passes (57 tests). No metric change. |
||
|
|
bfa8564fc8 |
feat(eval): Phase 2 EXT-3 hybrid-without-graph adapter — graph isolated
Third and closest-to-gbrain external baseline. Runs gbrain's full hybrid
search (vector + keyword + RRF fusion + dedup) WITHOUT the knowledge-graph
layer. Same engine, same embedder, same chunking, same hybrid fusion —
only traversePaths + typed-link extraction turned off.
This is the decisive comparator for "does the knowledge graph do useful
work?" Same everything-else, only graph differs. Any lead gbrain-after has
over EXT-3 is 100% attributable to the graph layer.
Files:
eval/runner/adapters/hybrid-nograph.ts — ~110 LOC
Implementation:
- New PGLiteEngine per run; auto_link set to 'false' (belt).
- importFromContent() used instead of bare putPage() so chunks +
embeddings get populated (hybridSearch needs them).
- NO runExtract() call — typed links/timeline stay empty (suspenders).
- hybridSearch(engine, q.text) answers every query. Aggregate chunks
to page-level by best chunk score.
FOUR-adapter side-by-side on 240-page rich-prose corpus, 145 relational queries:
| Adapter | P@5 | R@5 | Correct/Gold |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------------|
| gbrain-after | 49.1% | 97.9% | 248/261 |
| hybrid-nograph | 17.8% | 65.1% | 129/261 |
| ripgrep-bm25 | 17.1% | 62.4% | 124/261 |
| vector-only | 10.8% | 40.7% | 78/261 |
The headline delta nobody can hand-wave away:
gbrain-after → hybrid-nograph = +31.4 P@5, +32.9 R@5
hybrid-nograph → ripgrep-bm25 = +0.7 P@5, +2.7 R@5
Hybrid search (vector+keyword+RRF) over pure BM25 gains ~1 point. The
knowledge graph layer over hybrid gains ~31 points. The graph is doing
the work; adding it to a retrieval stack is what actually moves the needle
on relational queries. The vector/keyword/BM25 debate is a footnote.
Timing: hybrid-nograph init is ~2 min (embeds 240 pages once); query loop
is fast. gbrain-after is ~1.5s total because traversePaths doesn't need
embeddings. Runs at ~$0.02 Opus-equivalent in embedding cost.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
633be384c9 |
feat(eval): Phase 2 EXT-2 vector-only RAG adapter
Second external baseline for BrainBench. Pure cosine-similarity ranking using the SAME text-embedding-3-large model gbrain uses internally — apples-to-apples on the embedding layer so any gbrain lead reflects the graph + hybrid fusion, not a better embedder. Files: eval/runner/adapters/vector-only.ts ~130 LOC eval/runner/adapters/vector-only.test.ts 6 unit tests (cosine math) Design: - One vector per page (title + compiled_truth + timeline, capped 8K chars). - No chunking (intentional; chunked vector RAG would be EXT-2b later). - No keyword fallback (that's EXT-3 hybrid-without-graph). - Embeddings in batches of 50 via existing src/core/embedding.ts (retry+backoff). - Cost on 240 pages: ~$0.02/run. Three-adapter side-by-side on 240-page rich-prose corpus, 145 relational queries: | Adapter | P@5 | R@5 | Correct top-5 | |---------------|--------|--------|---------------| | gbrain-after | 49.1% | 97.9% | 248/261 | | ripgrep-bm25 | 17.1% | 62.4% | 124/261 | | vector-only | 10.8% | 40.7% | 78/261 | Interesting finding: vector-only scores WORSE than BM25 on relational queries like "Who invested in X?" — exact entity match matters more than semantic similarity for these templates. BM25 nails the entity-name term; vector-only returns topically-similar-but-not-mentioning pages. This is the known failure mode of pure-vector RAG on precise relational/identity queries. Real-world vector RAG systems always add keyword fallback; EXT-3 (hybrid-without-graph) will be that fairer comparator. gbrain's lead widens in vector-only comparison: +38.4 pts P@5, +57.2 pts R@5. The graph layer is doing the heavy lifting for relational traversal; pure vector RAG can't express "traverse 'attended' edges from this meeting page." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
629ba853ff |
feat(eval): Phase 2 adapter interface + EXT-1 ripgrep+BM25 baseline
Phase 2 credibility unlock: BrainBench now compares gbrain to external
baselines on the same corpus and queries. Transforms the benchmark from
internal ablation ("gbrain-graph beats gbrain-grep") to category comparison
("gbrain-graph beats classic BM25 by 32 pts P@5"). This is the #1 fix
from the 4-review arc — addresses Codex's core critique that v1's
before/after was self-referential.
Added:
eval/runner/types.ts — Adapter interface (v1.1 spec)
eval/runner/adapters/ripgrep-bm25.ts — EXT-1 classic IR baseline
eval/runner/adapters/ripgrep-bm25.test.ts — 11 unit tests, all pass
eval/runner/multi-adapter.ts — side-by-side scorer
Adapter interface (eng pass 2 spec):
- Thin 3-method Strategy: init(rawPages, config), query(q, state), snapshot(state)
- BrainState is opaque to runner (never inspected)
- Raw pages passed in-memory; gold/ never crosses adapter boundary
(structural ingestion-boundary enforcement)
- PoisonDisposition enum reserved for future poison-resistance scoring
EXT-1 ripgrep+BM25:
- Classic Lucene-variant IDF + k1/b tuned at standard 1.5/0.75
- Title tokens double-weighted for entity-page slug-match bias
- Stopword filter, alphanumeric tokenization, stable lexicographic tie-break
- Pure in-memory inverted index — no external deps, ~100 LOC core
First side-by-side results on 240-page rich-prose corpus, 145 relational queries:
| Adapter | P@5 | R@5 | Correct top-5 |
|---------------|--------|--------|---------------|
| gbrain-after | 49.1% | 97.9% | 248/261 |
| ripgrep-bm25 | 17.1% | 62.4% | 124/261 |
| Delta | +32.0 | +35.5 | +124 |
gbrain-after is the hybrid graph+grep config from PR #188. Ripgrep+BM25 is
a genuinely strong classic-IR baseline (BM25 is what Lucene/Elasticsearch
ship). gbrain's ~+32-point lead on relational queries reflects real work
by the knowledge graph layer: typed links + traversePaths surface the
correct answers in top-K that BM25 only pulls in via partial-text overlap.
Next in Phase 2: EXT-2 vector-only RAG + EXT-3 hybrid-without-graph
adapters. Both plug into the same Adapter interface.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|