Files
gbrain/test/eval
Garry TanandClaude Opus 4.6 33e2e73940 feat(eval): Day 7 — Cat 5 provenance runner + structured classify_claim judge
**eval/runner/cat5-provenance.ts** — BrainBench Cat 5 scoring. Samples
claims from gbrain brain-export and classifies each against its source
material via a dedicated Haiku judge (classify_claim tool with a
three-label enum: supported | unsupported | over-generalized).

Separate from judge.ts by design: Cat 5 is a single three-way
classification per claim, not a weighted rubric. Rather than overload
judge.ts with a mode switch, Cat 5 has its own tool definition
(CLASSIFY_CLAIM_TOOL) and prompt. The retry-once pattern, $20 cost gate
semantics, and structured parsing are mirrored from judge.ts so failures
look the same across Cats.

Metric: `citation_accuracy` = fraction where predicted label equals
gold expected_label. Threshold (informational): >0.90 per design-doc
METRICS.md. v1 ships with `enableThreshold: false` so the verdict is
always baseline_only — we don't have hand-authored gold claims yet, and
codex flagged that threshold gating should wait until the amara-life-v1
corpus + gold file authoring lands in Day 3b.

runCat5 uses a bounded-concurrency worker pool (default 4) to respect
Haiku rate limits across 100+ claim batches. Evidence pages are looked
up by slug from a caller-provided pagesBySlug map — missing pages don't
crash, they just pass an empty source list to the judge (correct
behavior for genuinely unsupported claims).

**Tests (23):** classifyClaim happy/retry/fallback paths with stubbed
Haiku, aggregate accuracy math, threshold gating (pass/fail vs
baseline_only), runCat5 concurrency + missing-page handling,
renderClaimPrompt embeds claim + sources correctly, parseClassification
rejects invalid enum values + plain-text responses.

Total eval suite now: 250 pass, 0 fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-20 22:01:58 +08:00
..