**eval/runner/cat8-skill-compliance.ts** — Deterministic, judge-free Cat 8
scoring. Replays inbound signals through the agent adapter (Day 5) and
extracts four iron-law metrics directly from the tool-bridge state:
- brain_first_compliance: agent called search/get_page BEFORE producing
its final answer. Non-compliance = hallucinating from general knowledge.
- back_link_compliance: every dry_run_put_page intent has at least one
markdown [Name](slug) back-link in its compiled_truth.
- citation_format: timeline entries use canonical `- **YYYY-MM-DD** |
Source — Summary`; long final answers cite at least one slug.
- tier_escalation: simple probes use light tooling (≥1 brain call);
complex probes require ≥2 brain calls or a dry_run write when
expects_dry_run_write is set.
No judge call required — everything is computable from
`tool_bridge_state.made_dry_run_writes` + `count_by_tool` + final_answer
regex. Fast, deterministic, reproducible.
Bounded concurrency (p-limit style) worker pool at default 4 to keep
Sonnet rate limits comfortable across 100-probe batches.
**eval/runner/cat9-workflows.ts** — Rubric-graded Cat 9. 5 canonical
workflows (meeting_ingestion, email_to_brain, daily_task_prep, briefing,
sync) × ~10 scenarios each. Each scenario runs through the agent adapter,
then judge.ts scores the answer against a per-scenario rubric.
`buildEvidence(scenario, agentResult, pagesBySlug)` composes the
JudgeEvidence contract: resolves ground_truth_slugs to full
GroundTruthPage[] from a slug-map, pulls tool_call_summary directly from
tool_bridge_state (no raw tool_result content — Section-3 defense),
attaches rubric from the scenario.
Per-workflow rollup: each workflow gets its own pass_rate so the verdict
can fail one workflow without failing the whole Cat. Overall verdict
requires every populated workflow's pass_rate ≥ threshold (default 0.80)
when enableThreshold=true.
Both Cats default to verdict=baseline_only in v1 per codex fix #9: real
thresholds return after 10-probe Haiku-vs-hand-score calibration (κ > 0.7)
runs against the Day 3b amara-life-v1 corpus.
**Tests (23):** Cat 8 per-metric scorer unit tests covering every branch
(brain_first ordering, back-link compliance on mixed writes, long vs
short answer citation requirement, tier escalation for simple/complex/
writey probes, finalAnswerCiteCount dedups across syntaxes). Cat 9
buildEvidence contract shape — evidence_refs flow from agent, missing
slugs skip gracefully, no raw_transcript/tool_result leakage to judge.
Cat 9 runCat9 integration with stubbed agent + mixed-verdict judge
produces fractional pass rates correctly.
Total eval suite now: 273 pass, 0 fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BrainBench
Public benchmark for personal knowledge brain agent stacks. Ships 4 adapter
configurations scored side-by-side on a 240-page rich-prose fictional corpus
(twin-amara). Measures retrieval, extraction quality, and per-link-type
accuracy.
What this answers: "Does the knowledge graph layer do useful work, or is gbrain just a thin wrapper over vector+keyword hybrid?" Headline: gbrain beats the closest external baseline (hybrid-without-graph, same embedder, same chunking) by +31 points P@5. The graph layer is load-bearing.
5-minute quickstart
# 1. Run the full benchmark (4 adapters × 5 runs, ~15 min wall clock)
bun run eval:run
# 2. Fast iteration (N=1 single run)
bun run eval:run:dev
# 3. Just the type-accuracy report
bun run eval:type-accuracy
# 4. Explore the canonical world (contributor-facing UI)
bun run eval:world:view
What's in the box
eval/
├── data/
│ ├── world-v1/ Canonical world (committed). 240 sharded JSON files.
│ │ One file per entity + _ledger.json metadata.
│ ├── amara-life-v1/ (v0.15+) Fictional-life corpus generated on demand.
│ │ inbox/slack/calendar/meetings/notes/docs +
│ │ corpus-manifest.json. Gitignored; run
│ │ `bun run eval:generate-amara-life` once.
│ └── gold/ (v0.15+) Sealed qrels + perturbation gold.
│ entities, backlinks, qrels, contradictions, poison,
│ personalization-rubric, implicit-preferences, citations.
│ Empty templates in v0.15; filled in v1 Complete.
├── schemas/ (v0.15+) Portable JSON Schema contracts.
│ corpus-manifest, public-probe (PublicQuery with gold
│ stripped), tool-schema (12 read + 3 dry_run, 32K cap),
│ transcript, scorecard (N ∈ {1,5,10}), evidence-contract.
│ Pins the v1→v2 Inspect AI driver-swap boundary.
├── generators/
│ ├── gen.ts Opus-backed world-v1 generator (cached, $80 cap)
│ ├── world.ts World-schema scaffolder
│ ├── world-html.ts World explorer HTML renderer (XSS-safe)
│ ├── amara-life.ts (v0.15+) Deterministic amara-life skeleton.
│ │ Mulberry32 PRNG, 15 contacts, 50+300+20+8+40 items,
│ │ plants 10/5/5/3 perturbations at fixed positions.
│ └── amara-life-gen.ts (v0.15+) Opus prose expansion. Structured cache key
│ (schema_version + template_hash + item_spec_hash),
│ $20 hard-stop, --dry-run for smoke tests.
├── runner/
│ ├── multi-adapter.ts 4-adapter side-by-side scorer (N=5, seeded order)
│ ├── type-accuracy.ts Per-link-type accuracy vs gold from _facts (Cat 2)
│ ├── adversarial.ts Cat 10 robustness — 22 hand-crafted edge cases
│ ├── all.ts Master runner (current: sequential execSync;
│ v1 Complete Day 10: rewrites to async + p-limit(2))
│ ├── before-after.ts Original v1 BEFORE/AFTER retrieval run
│ ├── types.ts Adapter, Page (extended with email|slack|cal|note),
│ Query, RankedDoc. PublicPage/PublicQuery land here
│ when sealed qrels enforcement ships (v1 Complete Day 9).
│ ├── adapters/
│ │ ├── ripgrep-bm25.ts EXT-1: classic IR baseline (BM25 over grep hits)
│ │ ├── vector-only.ts EXT-2: pure cosine similarity, same embedder
│ │ └── hybrid-nograph.ts EXT-3: gbrain hybrid with graph disabled
│ └── queries/
│ ├── tier5-fuzzy.ts 30 vague-recall queries (hand-authored)
│ ├── tier5_5-synthetic.ts 50 synthetic outsider queries (AI-authored, labeled)
│ ├── validator.ts Schema + temporal as_of_date + one-slash slug rule
│ └── index.ts Aggregator + validateAll()
├── cli/
│ ├── world-view.ts Render + open world.html
│ ├── query-validate.ts Validate a Query[] file
│ └── query-new.ts Scaffold a Query template
└── reports/ Benchmark scorecards (gitignored)
Three contributor paths
Path 1: Reproduce a published scorecard
# 1. Check out the specific gbrain commit referenced in the scorecard
git checkout <commit-sha>
# 2. Run the full benchmark
bun run eval:run
# 3. Compare your numbers to the scorecard. Deterministic adapters should
# match exactly. Embedding-based adapters should land within tolerance bands.
Path 2: Submit a new external adapter
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the adapter submission flow. Short version:
- Implement
eval/runner/adapters/<your-adapter>.tsconforming to theAdapterinterface ineval/runner/types.ts. - Add a unit test file alongside.
- Wire your adapter into
eval/runner/multi-adapter.ts(one line). bun run eval:run:devto verify.- Open a PR.
Path 3: Write Tier 5.5 externally-authored queries
The T5.5 queries currently in the repo are AI-authored (author: "synthetic-outsider-v1") as a placeholder. Real outside researchers should:
bun run eval:world:viewto understand the canonical worldbun run eval:query:new --tier externally-authored --author "@your-handle"- Edit the scaffolded template with a real query + gold slugs
bun run eval:query:validate path/to/your.json- Submit via
eval/external-authors/<your-handle>/queries.jsonin a PR
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the query-submission template.
Methodology one-pager
- Corpus: 240 Opus-generated fictional biographical pages. Fixed, committed, zero private data. Reproducibility baseline for any run.
- Gold: Each page's
_factsmetadata defines canonical relationships. The scorer never shows_factsto the adapters — raw pages only cross the ingestion boundary (structural enforcement inAdapter.init). - Metrics: P@5 and R@5 on relational queries (145 canonical from
_facts, 80 tier-5 + tier-5.5). Type accuracy on extracted edges (eval/runner/type-accuracy.ts). - N=5 runs per adapter with page-order shuffle (seeded LCG; runs are reproducible). Stddev surfaces order-dependent adapter bugs. Deterministic adapters correctly show stddev=0.
- Temporal queries require explicit
as_of_date(validated at query authoring time; rejected at load if a temporal verb is present without it).
Adapter scorecard (most recent, N=5)
See docs/benchmarks/2026-04-18-brainbench-v1.md for the full report.
Quick summary from bun run eval:run:
| Adapter | P@5 | R@5 |
|---|---|---|
| gbrain-after | 49.1% | 97.9% |
| hybrid-nograph | 17.8% | 65.1% |
| ripgrep-bm25 | 17.1% | 62.4% |
| vector-only | 10.8% | 40.7% |
The graph layer beats vector+keyword hybrid on relational queries by ~31 points; hybrid-without-graph barely edges BM25. That's the story.