mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain.git
synced 2026-07-28 14:59:47 +00:00
* fix(security): confine routing dotfiles, skills dir, slugs, and transcription exec Shared src/core/path-confine.ts consolidates the realpath-containment idiom (moved from sources-ops.ts) and adds isTrustedDotfile + isWriteTargetContained. - .gbrain-source (source-resolver) and .gbrain-mount (brain-resolver) walk-up dotfiles are now lstat trust-gated: a symlink, foreign-owned, or world-writable file is refused on multi-user hosts (#418), fail-closed on stat error. - resolveWorkspaceSkillsDir + every skills-dir tier (env, cwd_walk_up, repo_root, cwd_skills, install_path) route through realpath containment so a symlinked workspace/skills can't escape the declared workspace (#419). - resolveSourceId/resolveBrainId realpath both sides of the registered local_path / mount prefix match so a symlinked cwd can't misattribute source/brain. - validateSlug rejects NUL/control, bidi/RTL overrides, backslashes, and URL-encoded path separators at the shared putPage/updateSlug chokepoint; write-through confirms the file path stays within the source tree. - transcribeLargeFile uses execFileSync arg-arrays + fs.rmSync (no shell), so a path with shell metacharacters is never parsed by a shell (#245). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(security): default dynamic-registration clients to authorization_code Self-registered DCR clients (the unauthenticated network registration path) previously defaulted to the client_credentials grant, which bypasses the /authorize consent screen. They now default to authorization_code; an explicit client_credentials request is rejected with invalid_client_metadata unless the operator opts in with the new --enable-dcr-insecure flag. A loud stderr WARNING prints at startup whenever DCR is enabled (#1353). Manual CLI/admin client registration is unchanged (operator-trusted). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(security): schema-lint hardening migration (search_path + view security_invoker) Migration v120 brings existing brains to the same posture as fresh installs: - ALTER VIEW page_links SET (security_invoker = on) on Postgres so the view honors the caller's RLS instead of the owner's (the view-through-RLS bypass). - ALTER FUNCTION ... SET search_path on the gbrain-owned trigger/event functions (both engines, IF EXISTS so engine-only functions are skipped; body untouched, so the load-bearing auto_enable_rls event trigger is unchanged). Closes #171. - Broaden the BYPASSRLS preflight in the historical RLS migration gates to honor superuser and inherited-role BYPASSRLS, so a superuser-connected fresh install no longer aborts (#1385). Fresh-install function definitions in schema.sql / pglite-schema.ts are born-correct (regenerated schema-embedded.ts). scripts/check-search-path.sh is a new CI guard (wired into verify) that fails if a trigger function in the schema base files is added without SET search_path. Postgres-only assertions live in the bootstrap E2E; the PGLite path is covered by test/migration-v120.test.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * v0.42.55.0 fix(security): dotfile/skills/slug confinement, DCR consent default, schema-lint migration Bump VERSION + package.json to 0.42.55.0 and add the CHANGELOG entry for the security-hardening wave (#418 #419 #245 #1353 #1647 #171 #1385). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(security): note the DCR consent default in SECURITY.md (#1353) The "disable client_credentials, only allow authorization_code" guidance is now the built-in DCR default; document the new --enable-dcr-insecure escape hatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(todos): add takes_search + code_def to the federated by-slug P1 (#2200) The v0.42.55.0 eng-review codex pass flagged takes_search (holder-allowlist only) and code_def (brain-wide raw SQL over content_chunks) as remaining same-class surfaces. Noted on the existing #2200 P1 follow-up, with the caveat that the #2399 close-list deliberately keeps #1371/#2200 open until this lands. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(security): correct plpgsql alias collision in #1385 BYPASSRLS gate (real-PG) The broadened BYPASSRLS preflight aliased `pg_roles r`, but several RLS DO-blocks already declare `r record` for their backfill FOR loop, so plpgsql resolved `r.oid`/`r.rolbypassrls` to the unassigned record variable → "record \"r\" is not assigned yet" on real Postgres (PGLite tolerated it; the DATABASE_URL-gated e2e jobs are the backstop). Renamed the subquery alias to `pr` at all 10 migrate.ts sites; also broadened the schema.sql base RLS gate the same way (with the `pr` alias) for #1385 consistency on superuser fresh installs, and regenerated schema-embedded.ts. Also fixes a PRE-EXISTING engine-parity bug (confirmed failing on clean origin/master): the relationalFanout shape compared `canonical_chunk_id`, a serial id that diverges between a fresh PGLite engine and a shared Postgres DB (setupDB TRUNCATEs without RESTART IDENTITY). Compare its presence, not the exact value. Validated on real Postgres (pgvector/pg16): migration v120 applies, the v35 RLS backfill runs, and engine-parity + postgres-bootstrap + jsonb-parity are green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1539 lines
65 KiB
TypeScript
1539 lines
65 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
|
|
import { PGlite } from '@electric-sql/pglite';
|
|
import { vector } from '@electric-sql/pglite/vector';
|
|
import { pg_trgm } from '@electric-sql/pglite/contrib/pg_trgm';
|
|
import {
|
|
GBrainOAuthProvider,
|
|
coerceTimestamp,
|
|
ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS,
|
|
validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod,
|
|
InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError,
|
|
} from '../src/core/oauth-provider.ts';
|
|
import { hashToken, generateToken } from '../src/core/utils.ts';
|
|
import { PGLITE_SCHEMA_SQL } from '../src/core/pglite-schema.ts';
|
|
import { InvalidTokenError, InvalidClientMetadataError } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/auth/errors.js';
|
|
import type { AuthInfo as CoreAuthInfo } from '../src/core/operations.ts';
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Test setup: in-memory PGLite with OAuth tables
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
let db: PGlite;
|
|
let sql: (strings: TemplateStringsArray, ...values: unknown[]) => Promise<any>;
|
|
let provider: GBrainOAuthProvider;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
db = new PGlite({ extensions: { vector, pg_trgm } });
|
|
await db.exec(PGLITE_SCHEMA_SQL);
|
|
|
|
// Create a tagged template wrapper for PGLite
|
|
sql = async (strings: TemplateStringsArray, ...values: unknown[]) => {
|
|
const query = strings.reduce((acc, str, i) => acc + str + (i < values.length ? `$${i + 1}` : ''), '');
|
|
const result = await db.query(query, values as any[]);
|
|
return result.rows;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
provider = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql, tokenTtl: 60, refreshTtl: 300 });
|
|
}, 30_000); // PGLITE_SCHEMA_SQL execution under full-suite load can exceed default 5s
|
|
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
if (db) await db.close();
|
|
}, 15_000);
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// hashToken + generateToken utilities
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('hashToken', () => {
|
|
test('produces consistent SHA-256 hex', () => {
|
|
const hash = hashToken('test-token');
|
|
expect(hash).toHaveLength(64);
|
|
expect(hashToken('test-token')).toBe(hash); // deterministic
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('different inputs produce different hashes', () => {
|
|
expect(hashToken('a')).not.toBe(hashToken('b'));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('generateToken', () => {
|
|
test('produces prefixed random hex', () => {
|
|
const token = generateToken('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(token).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(token).toHaveLength('gbrain_cl_'.length + 64); // 32 bytes = 64 hex chars
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('tokens are unique', () => {
|
|
const a = generateToken('test_');
|
|
const b = generateToken('test_');
|
|
expect(a).not.toBe(b);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// coerceTimestamp — postgres BIGINT-as-string boundary helper
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('coerceTimestamp', () => {
|
|
test('null returns undefined', () => {
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp(null)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('undefined returns undefined', () => {
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp(undefined)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('numeric string coerces to number', () => {
|
|
// The actual production path: postgres-js with prepare:false returns
|
|
// BIGINT columns as strings.
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp('12345')).toBe(12345);
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp('1735689600')).toBe(1735689600);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('native number passes through', () => {
|
|
// Direct-PG users on prepare:true get native numbers.
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp(12345)).toBe(12345);
|
|
expect(coerceTimestamp(0)).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('non-finite input throws (fail-closed contract)', () => {
|
|
// The load-bearing change vs Number(): corrupt rows fail loud at the
|
|
// boundary instead of letting NaN flow through to the SDK as a
|
|
// fake-valid `expiresAt`.
|
|
expect(() => coerceTimestamp('not-a-number')).toThrow(/non-finite/);
|
|
expect(() => coerceTimestamp(NaN)).toThrow(/non-finite/);
|
|
expect(() => coerceTimestamp(Infinity)).toThrow(/non-finite/);
|
|
expect(() => coerceTimestamp(-Infinity)).toThrow(/non-finite/);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Client Registration
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('client registration', () => {
|
|
test('registerClientManual creates a client', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId, clientSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'test-agent', ['client_credentials'], 'read write',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(clientId).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(clientSecret).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
|
|
// Verify client exists in DB
|
|
const client = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId);
|
|
expect(client).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(client!.client_name).toBe('test-agent');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('getClient returns undefined for unknown client', async () => {
|
|
const client = await provider.clientsStore.getClient('nonexistent');
|
|
expect(client).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('duplicate client_id is rejected', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'dup-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
// Try to insert same client_id directly
|
|
await expect(
|
|
sql`INSERT INTO oauth_clients (client_id, client_name, scope) VALUES (${clientId}, ${'dup'}, ${'read'})`,
|
|
).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Client Credentials Exchange
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('client credentials', () => {
|
|
let clientId: string;
|
|
let clientSecret: string;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'cc-test-agent', ['client_credentials'], 'read write',
|
|
);
|
|
clientId = result.clientId;
|
|
if (!result.clientSecret) throw new Error('test bug: expected confidential client to have secret');
|
|
clientSecret = result.clientSecret;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('valid exchange returns access token', async () => {
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret, 'read');
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
expect(tokens.token_type).toBe('bearer');
|
|
expect(tokens.expires_in).toBe(60);
|
|
expect(tokens.scope).toBe('read');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('no refresh token issued for CC grant', async () => {
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret, 'read');
|
|
expect(tokens.refresh_token).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('wrong secret is rejected', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, 'wrong-secret', 'read'),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow('Invalid client secret');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('client without CC grant is rejected', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId: noCC } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'no-cc-agent', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeClientCredentials(noCC, 'any-secret', 'read'),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow('not authorized');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scope is filtered to allowed scopes', async () => {
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret, 'read write admin');
|
|
// Client only has 'read write', admin should be filtered out
|
|
expect(tokens.scope).not.toContain('admin');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Token Verification
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('verifyAccessToken', () => {
|
|
test('valid token returns auth info', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId, clientSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'verify-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read write',
|
|
);
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret!, 'read');
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
|
|
expect(authInfo.clientId).toBe(clientId);
|
|
expect(authInfo.scopes).toContain('read');
|
|
expect(authInfo.token).toBe(tokens.access_token);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('expired token is rejected', async () => {
|
|
// Insert a token that's already expired
|
|
const expiredToken = generateToken('gbrain_at_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(expiredToken);
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${hash}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) - 100})
|
|
`;
|
|
await expect(provider.verifyAccessToken(expiredToken)).rejects.toThrow('expired');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('unknown token is rejected', async () => {
|
|
await expect(provider.verifyAccessToken('nonexistent-token')).rejects.toThrow('Invalid token');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// v0.36.1.x #935: the SDK's requireBearerAuth middleware only returns 401
|
|
// on InvalidTokenError; bare Error falls through to 500. Lock in the class.
|
|
test('verifyAccessToken throws InvalidTokenError (not bare Error) on expired token', async () => {
|
|
const expiredToken = generateToken('gbrain_at_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(expiredToken);
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${hash}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) - 100})
|
|
`;
|
|
let caught: unknown;
|
|
try {
|
|
await provider.verifyAccessToken(expiredToken);
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
caught = e;
|
|
}
|
|
expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(InvalidTokenError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verifyAccessToken throws InvalidTokenError (not bare Error) on unknown token', async () => {
|
|
let caught: unknown;
|
|
try {
|
|
await provider.verifyAccessToken('nonexistent-token');
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
caught = e;
|
|
}
|
|
expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(InvalidTokenError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('NULL expires_at is treated as expired (fail-closed)', async () => {
|
|
// Schema declares oauth_tokens.expires_at as nullable BIGINT (schema.sql:372).
|
|
// Hand-modified or corrupt rows could land with NULL; verifyAccessToken must
|
|
// fail-closed, not return an undefined-bearing AuthInfo that the SDK accepts.
|
|
const nullExpiryToken = generateToken('gbrain_at_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(nullExpiryToken);
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${hash}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${null})
|
|
`;
|
|
await expect(provider.verifyAccessToken(nullExpiryToken)).rejects.toThrow('expired');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('cascade-deleted client invalidates its tokens (Invalid token, not Expired)', async () => {
|
|
// revoke-client does DELETE FROM oauth_clients WHERE client_id = ...
|
|
// The schema-level FK cascade (schema.sql:370) wipes oauth_tokens too.
|
|
// verifyAccessToken on a previously-minted token from that client must
|
|
// fail with "Invalid token" (cascade purged the row) — distinct from
|
|
// "Token expired" so logs distinguish the failure modes.
|
|
const { clientId, clientSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'cascade-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret!, 'read');
|
|
await sql`DELETE FROM oauth_clients WHERE client_id = ${clientId}`;
|
|
await expect(provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token)).rejects.toThrow('Invalid token');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('expiresAt is always a number (not string) — SDK bearerAuth compat', async () => {
|
|
// Regression: postgres driver with prepare:false returns integers as strings.
|
|
// MCP SDK's bearerAuth middleware checks typeof === 'number' and rejects strings.
|
|
// verifyAccessToken must cast to Number() before returning.
|
|
const { clientId, clientSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'typeof-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret!, 'read');
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof authInfo.expiresAt).toBe('number');
|
|
expect(Number.isNaN(authInfo.expiresAt)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(authInfo.expiresAt).toBeGreaterThan(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('legacy access_tokens fallback works', async () => {
|
|
// Insert a legacy bearer token
|
|
const legacyToken = generateToken('gbrain_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(legacyToken);
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO access_tokens (id, name, token_hash)
|
|
VALUES (${crypto.randomUUID()}, ${'legacy-agent'}, ${hash})
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(legacyToken);
|
|
expect(authInfo.clientId).toBe('legacy-agent');
|
|
expect(authInfo.scopes).toEqual(['read', 'write', 'admin']); // grandfathered full access
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('legacy access_tokens fallback honors permissions.source_id array grants', async () => {
|
|
// oauth.test.ts initializes the static PGLite schema blob, not the full
|
|
// migration stack. Add the v38 permissions column here so the row matches
|
|
// a modern brain carrying a legacy-token source grant.
|
|
await sql`
|
|
ALTER TABLE access_tokens
|
|
ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS permissions JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '{"takes_holders":["world"]}'::jsonb
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
const legacyToken = generateToken('gbrain_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(legacyToken);
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO access_tokens (id, name, token_hash, permissions)
|
|
VALUES (
|
|
${crypto.randomUUID()},
|
|
${'legacy-federated-agent'},
|
|
${hash},
|
|
${JSON.stringify({ source_id: ['default', 'src-a', 'src-b'] })}::jsonb
|
|
)
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(legacyToken) as CoreAuthInfo;
|
|
expect(authInfo.clientId).toBe('legacy-federated-agent');
|
|
expect(authInfo.sourceId).toBe('default');
|
|
expect(authInfo.allowedSources).toEqual(['default', 'src-a', 'src-b']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Token Revocation
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('revokeToken', () => {
|
|
test('revoked token no longer verifies', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId, clientSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'revoke-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(clientId, clientSecret!, 'read');
|
|
|
|
// Verify token works
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
expect(authInfo.clientId).toBe(clientId);
|
|
|
|
// Revoke it
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
await provider.revokeToken!(client, { token: tokens.access_token });
|
|
|
|
// Should no longer verify
|
|
await expect(provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('revoking already-revoked token is a no-op', async () => {
|
|
// This should not throw
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(
|
|
(await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0].client_id as string,
|
|
))!;
|
|
await provider.revokeToken!(client, { token: 'already-gone' });
|
|
// No error = pass
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Authorization Code Flow
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('authorization code flow', () => {
|
|
test('code issuance and exchange', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'authcode-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read write',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
// Mock Express response for authorize
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = {
|
|
redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; },
|
|
} as any;
|
|
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'test-challenge-hash',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read', 'write'],
|
|
state: 'test-state',
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
|
|
expect(redirectUrl).toContain('code=gbrain_code_');
|
|
expect(redirectUrl).toContain('state=test-state');
|
|
|
|
// Extract code from redirect URL
|
|
const url = new URL(redirectUrl);
|
|
const code = url.searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
// Exchange code for tokens
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
expect(tokens.refresh_token).toBeDefined(); // Auth code flow includes refresh
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('code is single-use', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'single-use-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
// First exchange works
|
|
await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
// Second exchange fails (code consumed)
|
|
await expect(provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('expired code is rejected', async () => {
|
|
// Insert an already-expired code
|
|
const expiredCode = generateToken('gbrain_code_');
|
|
const hash = hashToken(expiredCode);
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
|
|
await sql`
|
|
INSERT INTO oauth_codes (code_hash, client_id, scopes, code_challenge,
|
|
redirect_uri, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${hash}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'},
|
|
${'challenge'}, ${'http://localhost/cb'}, ${Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) - 100})
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(firstClient.client_id as string))!;
|
|
await expect(provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, expiredCode)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// F-AUTHZ regression. The MCP SDK's authorize handler splits `?scope=...`
|
|
// verbatim and forwards the raw list to the provider, so the provider must
|
|
// clamp against the client's registered grant. Pre-fix the INSERT into
|
|
// oauth_codes used `params.scopes || []` raw, so a `read`-registered client
|
|
// requesting `?scope=admin` got an admin access token at /token exchange.
|
|
// This pins the parallel posture to client_credentials' filter pattern
|
|
// (line 513-515) and refresh's F3 subset enforcement (RFC 6749 §6).
|
|
test('authorize clamps requested scopes against client.scope (RFC 6749 §3.3)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'authz-clamp-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
|
|
// Read-only client requests admin via the SDK's parsed scopes array.
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read', 'write', 'admin'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
// The token's stored scopes must equal the clamped subset.
|
|
const auth = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
expect(auth.scopes).toEqual(['read']);
|
|
expect(auth.scopes).not.toContain('write');
|
|
expect(auth.scopes).not.toContain('admin');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('authorize subset request returns subset', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'authz-subset-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read write',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
const auth = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
expect(auth.scopes).toEqual(['read']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CSO finding #2 regression. The pre-fix SELECT-then-DELETE pattern let two
|
|
// concurrent token requests with the same code both pass the SELECT, both
|
|
// running DELETE (no-op on second) and both calling issueTokens. The fix is
|
|
// DELETE...RETURNING in one statement; this test fires N=10 concurrent
|
|
// exchanges and asserts exactly one succeeds.
|
|
test('concurrent exchange requests: only one succeeds (TOCTOU race)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'toctou-code-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
const N = 10;
|
|
const results = await Promise.allSettled(
|
|
Array.from({ length: N }, () => provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code)),
|
|
);
|
|
const successes = results.filter(r => r.status === 'fulfilled');
|
|
const failures = results.filter(r => r.status === 'rejected');
|
|
expect(successes.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(failures.length).toBe(N - 1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Refresh Token
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('refresh token', () => {
|
|
test('valid refresh rotates tokens', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'refresh-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read write',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read', 'write'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
// Refresh
|
|
const newTokens = await provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!, ['read']);
|
|
expect(newTokens.access_token).not.toBe(tokens.access_token);
|
|
expect(newTokens.refresh_token).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(newTokens.refresh_token).not.toBe(tokens.refresh_token); // rotated
|
|
|
|
// Old refresh token should no longer work
|
|
await expect(provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CSO finding #3 regression. Same TOCTOU pattern as auth code; the fix is
|
|
// DELETE...RETURNING. Detection of stolen refresh tokens (RFC 6749 §10.4)
|
|
// depends on second-use failure, so two concurrent succeed = no detection.
|
|
test('concurrent refresh requests: only one succeeds (TOCTOU race)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'toctou-refresh-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
const N = 10;
|
|
const results = await Promise.allSettled(
|
|
Array.from({ length: N }, () => provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!)),
|
|
);
|
|
const successes = results.filter(r => r.status === 'fulfilled');
|
|
expect(successes.length).toBe(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Token Sweep
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('sweepExpiredTokens', () => {
|
|
test('removes expired tokens', async () => {
|
|
// Insert some expired tokens
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
const expired1 = hashToken(generateToken('sweep_'));
|
|
const expired2 = hashToken(generateToken('sweep_'));
|
|
|
|
await sql`INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${expired1}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${1})`;
|
|
await sql`INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${expired2}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${2})`;
|
|
|
|
await provider.sweepExpiredTokens();
|
|
|
|
// Verify they're gone
|
|
const remaining = await sql`SELECT count(*)::int as count FROM oauth_tokens WHERE expires_at < 100`;
|
|
expect(remaining[0].count).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Scope Annotations
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('operation scope annotations', () => {
|
|
test('all operations have a scope', () => {
|
|
const { operations } = require('../src/core/operations.ts');
|
|
for (const op of operations) {
|
|
expect(op.scope, `${op.name} missing scope`).toBeDefined();
|
|
// v0.28 added sources_admin and users_admin to the union.
|
|
// v0.38 added 'agent' for submit_agent (D13).
|
|
expect([
|
|
'read', 'write', 'admin', 'sources_admin', 'users_admin', 'agent',
|
|
]).toContain(op.scope);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('mutating operations are write/admin/sources_admin/users_admin/agent scoped', () => {
|
|
const { operations } = require('../src/core/operations.ts');
|
|
for (const op of operations) {
|
|
if (op.mutating) {
|
|
// v0.28: sources_admin permits sources_add / sources_remove (mutating
|
|
// sources, not pages); read scope is the only thing too narrow for
|
|
// any mutating op. v0.38: 'agent' is a mutating-axis scope for
|
|
// submit_agent (creates jobs, spends money, but contained by bindings).
|
|
expect(
|
|
['write', 'admin', 'sources_admin', 'users_admin', 'agent'],
|
|
`${op.name} is mutating but not a write-axis scope`,
|
|
).toContain(op.scope);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('sync_brain and file_upload are localOnly', () => {
|
|
const { operationsByName } = require('../src/core/operations.ts');
|
|
expect(operationsByName.sync_brain.localOnly).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(operationsByName.file_upload.localOnly).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('file_list and file_url are localOnly', () => {
|
|
const { operationsByName } = require('../src/core/operations.ts');
|
|
expect(operationsByName.file_list.localOnly).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(operationsByName.file_url.localOnly).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// CSO finding #5 — pgArray escape + DCR redirect_uri validation
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('redirect_uri validation (DCR)', () => {
|
|
test('http://localhost is allowed (loopback exception)', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'localhost-ok',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('https:// is allowed', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'https-ok',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plaintext http:// (non-loopback) is rejected', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'http-rejected',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['http://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/https/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('non-URL string is rejected', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'garbage',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['not-a-url'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// pgArray escape regression: an element containing a comma must be stored
|
|
// as ONE element, not parsed by Postgres as TWO. Without the fix, the
|
|
// comma would smuggle a second redirect_uri into the registered list.
|
|
test('redirect_uri with embedded comma stored as single element', async () => {
|
|
// Use a localhost URI with comma in the path so it passes HTTPS validation.
|
|
const trickyUri = 'http://localhost:3000/cb,evil';
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'comma-test',
|
|
redirect_uris: [trickyUri],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Read back from the DB and confirm exactly one element.
|
|
const stored = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(result.client_id);
|
|
expect(stored).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(stored!.redirect_uris).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(stored!.redirect_uris[0]).toBe(trickyUri);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F1 / F4 — Wrong-client cross-tenant attempts
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
//
|
|
// The atomic client_id binding lives in the DELETE WHERE clause for auth
|
|
// codes (exchange + challenge), refresh tokens (rotate), and revocations.
|
|
// Without it, any authenticated client that knew/guessed another client's
|
|
// hash could (a) consume the code/refresh on the wrong-client path,
|
|
// burning it for the legitimate client, or (b) revoke another client's
|
|
// tokens. These tests pin the negative invariant — wrong client fails —
|
|
// AND the positive invariant — owner still succeeds atomically afterward.
|
|
|
|
describe('F1/F4 cross-client isolation', () => {
|
|
test('wrong client cannot consume another client authorization code', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId: ownerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'authcode-owner-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const { clientId: attackerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'authcode-attacker-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const owner = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(ownerId))!;
|
|
const attacker = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(attackerId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(owner, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
// Attacker holding the same code MUST be rejected.
|
|
await expect(provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(attacker, code)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// The atomic predicate's payoff: the legitimate owner can STILL redeem
|
|
// the code afterward. Without it, the attacker would have burned the
|
|
// row in the DELETE and the owner's redemption would 404.
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(owner, code);
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('wrong client cannot read another client PKCE challenge', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId: ownerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'challenge-owner-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const { clientId: attackerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'challenge-attacker-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const owner = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(ownerId))!;
|
|
const attacker = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(attackerId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(owner, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'owner-challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
await expect(provider.challengeForAuthorizationCode!(attacker, code)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
await expect(provider.challengeForAuthorizationCode!(owner, code)).resolves.toBe('owner-challenge');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('wrong client cannot revoke another client token', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId: ownerId, clientSecret: ownerSecret } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'revoke-owner-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
const { clientId: attackerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'revoke-attacker-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeClientCredentials(ownerId, ownerSecret!, 'read');
|
|
const attacker = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(attackerId))!;
|
|
|
|
// Attacker tries to revoke owner's token. revokeToken returns void
|
|
// (silent on no-op), so we assert the token still verifies after.
|
|
await provider.revokeToken!(attacker, { token: tokens.access_token });
|
|
const authInfo = await provider.verifyAccessToken(tokens.access_token);
|
|
expect(authInfo.clientId).toBe(ownerId);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F2 + F3 — Refresh-token cross-client isolation + scope subset
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('F2/F3 refresh hardening', () => {
|
|
test('wrong client cannot burn another client refresh token', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId: ownerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'refresh-owner-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const { clientId: attackerId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'refresh-attacker-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const owner = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(ownerId))!;
|
|
const attacker = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(attackerId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(owner, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(owner, code);
|
|
|
|
// Attacker rejected.
|
|
await expect(provider.exchangeRefreshToken(attacker, tokens.refresh_token!)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// Owner still redeems atomically — the row was not burned by the
|
|
// attacker's attempt.
|
|
const rotated = await provider.exchangeRefreshToken(owner, tokens.refresh_token!);
|
|
expect(rotated.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
expect(rotated.refresh_token).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(rotated.refresh_token).not.toBe(tokens.refresh_token);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('refresh cannot request scopes outside the original grant (F3)', async () => {
|
|
// Client allowed scopes 'read write', but the user only authorized 'read'.
|
|
// The refresh token row carries the granted scope, NOT the client's
|
|
// currently-allowed scopes (codex C9). Requesting 'write' on refresh
|
|
// must fail even though the client could mint a fresh write-scoped
|
|
// token via a new authorize round trip.
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'refresh-scope-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read write',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
// Attempt to escalate to write — must reject.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!, ['read', 'write']),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/scope/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// T1 (eng-review): admin grant must be refreshable down to sources_admin
|
|
// via hasScope. Pre-v0.28 the F3 check was exact-string-match, so an
|
|
// admin grant could not refresh down to sources_admin even though admin
|
|
// implies it. gstack /setup-gbrain Path 4 needs this to work.
|
|
test('admin grant CAN refresh down to sources_admin (hasScope hierarchy)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'admin-down-test', ['authorization_code'], 'admin',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['admin'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
// Refresh requesting only sources_admin — admin implies it, so this
|
|
// must succeed and the new token must carry only the requested subset.
|
|
const rotated = await provider.exchangeRefreshToken(
|
|
client, tokens.refresh_token!, ['sources_admin'],
|
|
);
|
|
expect(rotated.access_token).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(rotated.scope).toBe('sources_admin');
|
|
|
|
// The original refresh token must be dead (single-use rotation).
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// Note: rotated.refresh_token's grant is now sources_admin, not admin.
|
|
// Refreshing it up to users_admin would correctly fail (sibling
|
|
// non-implication) — that constraint is exercised in the F3 sibling
|
|
// test below. To prove "admin implies users_admin too" we'd need a
|
|
// fresh authorize round trip, which the existing F2 hardening tests
|
|
// already cover. One direction at a time.
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('admin grant CAN refresh down to users_admin (different axis)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'admin-down-users-test', ['authorization_code'], 'admin',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['admin'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
const rotated = await provider.exchangeRefreshToken(
|
|
client, tokens.refresh_token!, ['users_admin'],
|
|
);
|
|
expect(rotated.scope).toBe('users_admin');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// T1 sibling: write grant cannot refresh up to sources_admin (different axis)
|
|
test('write grant CANNOT refresh to sources_admin (sibling non-implication)', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'write-not-sources-admin-test', ['authorization_code'], 'write',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['write'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeRefreshToken(client, tokens.refresh_token!, ['sources_admin']),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/scope/i);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// v0.28 — ALLOWED_SCOPES allowlist at registration time
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('v0.28 ALLOWED_SCOPES allowlist', () => {
|
|
test('registerClientManual rejects unknown scope strings', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.registerClientManual('bad-scope', ['client_credentials'], 'read flying-unicorn'),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Unknown scope/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('registerClientManual accepts every canonical scope', async () => {
|
|
for (const scope of ['read', 'write', 'admin', 'sources_admin', 'users_admin']) {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
`accept-${scope}`, ['client_credentials'], scope,
|
|
);
|
|
const client = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId);
|
|
expect(client?.scope).toBe(scope);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('registerClient (DCR) rejects unknown scope strings', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'dcr-bad-scope',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/cb'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read bogus_scope',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
} as any),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Unknown scope/);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F5 — fail-loud column probes (was: bare catch{})
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('F5 verifyAccessToken / client_credentials column probes', () => {
|
|
test('non-schema SQL failures are not swallowed by client credentials soft-delete probe', async () => {
|
|
// Synthesize a non-schema error (SQLSTATE 57P01 = admin_shutdown) and
|
|
// make sure the catch block re-throws instead of silently treating
|
|
// the client as not-revoked. Without the predicate this throw used to
|
|
// disappear into the void.
|
|
const sqlFailure = Object.assign(new Error('database session failed'), { code: '57P01' });
|
|
const fakeSql = async (strings: TemplateStringsArray): Promise<Record<string, unknown>[]> => {
|
|
const query = strings.join('$');
|
|
if (query.includes('SELECT client_id, client_secret_hash')) {
|
|
return [{
|
|
client_id: 'gbrain_cl_fake',
|
|
client_secret_hash: hashToken('secret'),
|
|
client_name: 'fake',
|
|
redirect_uris: [],
|
|
grant_types: ['client_credentials'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
client_id_issued_at: 1,
|
|
}];
|
|
}
|
|
if (query.includes('SELECT deleted_at')) throw sqlFailure;
|
|
return [];
|
|
};
|
|
const failingProvider = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql: fakeSql as any });
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
failingProvider.exchangeClientCredentials('gbrain_cl_fake', 'secret', 'read'),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow('database session failed');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F6 — sweepExpiredTokens returns a meaningful count across both engines
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('F6 sweepExpiredTokens count', () => {
|
|
test('returns count > 0 after deleting expired rows', async () => {
|
|
const firstClient = (await sql`SELECT client_id FROM oauth_clients LIMIT 1`)[0];
|
|
const t1 = hashToken(generateToken('sweep_count_'));
|
|
const t2 = hashToken(generateToken('sweep_count_'));
|
|
await sql`INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${t1}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${1})`;
|
|
await sql`INSERT INTO oauth_tokens (token_hash, token_type, client_id, scopes, expires_at)
|
|
VALUES (${t2}, ${'access'}, ${firstClient.client_id as string}, ${'{read}'}, ${2})`;
|
|
|
|
const swept = await provider.sweepExpiredTokens();
|
|
|
|
// Pre-fix: returned 0 on PGLite/postgres.js even when rows were deleted
|
|
// because (result as any).count was unset on at least one path. With
|
|
// RETURNING 1 + result.length, the actual row count flows back.
|
|
expect(swept).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F7c — auth code redirect_uri validated on /token (RFC 6749 §4.1.3)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('F7c redirect_uri binding on auth code exchange', () => {
|
|
test('matching redirect_uri succeeds', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'redir-match-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(
|
|
client, code, undefined, 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('mismatched redirect_uri rejects', async () => {
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'redir-mismatch-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
// Attacker submitting the auth code with a different redirect_uri (e.g.,
|
|
// an attacker-controlled callback URL) MUST be rejected. RFC 6749 §4.1.3.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(
|
|
client, code, undefined, 'https://attacker.example/cb',
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty-string redirect_uri does NOT bypass the binding', async () => {
|
|
// D15 / adversarial-review fix: `redirectUri ? ...` would treat empty string
|
|
// as falsy and silently fall through to the no-redirect-uri branch,
|
|
// letting an attacker submit `redirect_uri=""` to bypass the predicate.
|
|
// The fix uses `redirectUri !== undefined`. This test asserts the bypass
|
|
// is closed: an empty-string redirect_uri must reject (zero-row DELETE
|
|
// since stored value is the original non-empty URI), not slip through.
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'redir-empty-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code, undefined, ''),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('omitted redirect_uri (back-compat) still succeeds', async () => {
|
|
// Existing callers that don't pass redirectUri keep working — the
|
|
// predicate only fires when redirectUri is provided. This protects
|
|
// against breaking SDK consumers that haven't adopted the parameter
|
|
// yet, while still hardening the path for those that have.
|
|
const { clientId } = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'redir-omitted-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
);
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(clientId))!;
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'challenge',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// F12 — DCR disable via constructor option (cleanup, not security)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('F12 dcrDisabled constructor option', () => {
|
|
test('clientsStore omits registerClient when dcrDisabled=true', () => {
|
|
const dcrOff = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql, dcrDisabled: true });
|
|
const store = dcrOff.clientsStore;
|
|
expect(typeof store.getClient).toBe('function');
|
|
// SDK's mcpAuthRouter checks for registerClient before wiring up the
|
|
// /register endpoint. Absence of the method == DCR endpoint not exposed.
|
|
expect((store as any).registerClient).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('clientsStore exposes registerClient when dcrDisabled is false/unset', () => {
|
|
const dcrOn = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql });
|
|
expect(typeof dcrOn.clientsStore.registerClient).toBe('function');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('registerClientManual still works on dcrDisabled providers (CLI path)', async () => {
|
|
// The CLI code path uses registerClientManual, which is independent of
|
|
// the DCR /register endpoint. dcrDisabled must NOT break it.
|
|
const dcrOff = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql, dcrDisabled: true });
|
|
const result = await dcrOff.registerClientManual(
|
|
'dcr-disabled-cli-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.clientId).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// v0.34.1 (#909) — PKCE public-client DCR (RFC 7591 §3.2.1)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
//
|
|
// Per RFC 7591 §3.2.1, when a DCR client declares
|
|
// `token_endpoint_auth_method: "none"` (PKCE-only public clients like Claude
|
|
// Code, Cursor), the authorization server MUST NOT issue a client_secret.
|
|
// Pre-fix, unconditional secret generation made the MCP SDK's clientAuth
|
|
// middleware reject valid public-client flows on /token.
|
|
|
|
describe('PKCE DCR public-client gate (#909)', () => {
|
|
test("registerClient with token_endpoint_auth_method='none' omits client_secret", async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'public-pkce-client',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'none',
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
// RFC 7591 §3.2.1: public clients get NO client_secret in the response.
|
|
expect(result.client_secret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(result.token_endpoint_auth_method).toBe('none');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('default auth_method (omitted) still issues a client_secret', async () => {
|
|
// Regression guard: confidential clients (the existing default) must
|
|
// keep their secret-issuing behavior unchanged.
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'confidential-default',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
// token_endpoint_auth_method omitted; falls back to 'client_secret_post'
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(result.client_secret).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('explicit client_secret_post still issues a client_secret', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'confidential-explicit',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(result.client_secret).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('getClient on a public client returns client_secret=undefined (NULL normalized)', async () => {
|
|
// The SDK's clientAuth middleware checks `client.client_secret === undefined`
|
|
// (not `=== null`) to decide whether to enforce secret comparison on /token.
|
|
// Without normalization, Postgres NULL would reach the SDK as JS null and
|
|
// the secret check would mis-fire on every public client.
|
|
const reg = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'public-getclient-norm',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.com/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'none',
|
|
});
|
|
const stored = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(reg.client_id);
|
|
expect(stored).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(stored!.client_secret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(stored!.token_endpoint_auth_method).toBe('none');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('PKCE flow end-to-end: public client /authorize then /token, no secret needed', async () => {
|
|
// Full F7 regression #15: public client completes auth_code → token
|
|
// exchange without ever presenting a client_secret.
|
|
const reg = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'pkce-roundtrip',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['http://localhost:3000/callback'],
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'none',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Re-fetch via getClient to mirror what the SDK middleware sees.
|
|
const client = (await provider.clientsStore.getClient(reg.client_id))!;
|
|
expect(client.client_secret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
let redirectUrl = '';
|
|
const mockRes = { redirect: (url: string) => { redirectUrl = url; } } as any;
|
|
await provider.authorize(client, {
|
|
codeChallenge: 'test-challenge-value',
|
|
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3000/callback',
|
|
scopes: ['read'],
|
|
}, mockRes);
|
|
const code = new URL(redirectUrl).searchParams.get('code')!;
|
|
expect(code).toMatch(/^gbrain_code_/);
|
|
|
|
// Exchange the code — public client; no secret on the wire.
|
|
const tokens = await provider.exchangeAuthorizationCode(client, code);
|
|
expect(tokens.access_token).toStartWith('gbrain_at_');
|
|
// SDK normalizes token_type per RFC 6750 §6.1.1 (case-insensitive);
|
|
// implementations may emit "bearer" lowercase.
|
|
expect(String(tokens.token_type).toLowerCase()).toBe('bearer');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// v0.41.3 — T1: ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS + validator
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('v0.41.3 ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS', () => {
|
|
test('Set contains exactly the three SDK-advertised methods', () => {
|
|
expect(ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS.size).toBe(3);
|
|
expect(ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS.has('client_secret_post')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS.has('client_secret_basic')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS.has('none')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('client_secret_basic is included — codex F3 regression', () => {
|
|
// The codex outside-voice review caught that omitting client_secret_basic
|
|
// would break operators using HTTP Basic for confidential client auth at
|
|
// the /token endpoint (server already supports it at serve-http.ts:468).
|
|
expect(ALLOWED_TOKEN_ENDPOINT_AUTH_METHODS.has('client_secret_basic')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('v0.41.3 validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod', () => {
|
|
test('undefined → "client_secret_post" (RFC 7591 default)', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod(undefined)).toBe('client_secret_post');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('null → "client_secret_post"', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod(null)).toBe('client_secret_post');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty string → "client_secret_post"', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('')).toBe('client_secret_post');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('"client_secret_post" → "client_secret_post"', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('client_secret_post')).toBe('client_secret_post');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('"client_secret_basic" → "client_secret_basic"', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('client_secret_basic')).toBe('client_secret_basic');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('"none" → "none" (public PKCE client)', () => {
|
|
expect(validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('none')).toBe('none');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('unknown method throws InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError', () => {
|
|
expect(() => validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('frobnicate')).toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('error message names the bad value + all allowed methods', () => {
|
|
try {
|
|
validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('frobnicate');
|
|
throw new Error('should have thrown');
|
|
} catch (e: any) {
|
|
expect(e.message).toContain('frobnicate');
|
|
expect(e.message).toContain('client_secret_post');
|
|
expect(e.message).toContain('client_secret_basic');
|
|
expect(e.message).toContain('none');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('non-string input throws', () => {
|
|
expect(() => validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod(123 as any)).toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
expect(() => validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod({} as any)).toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
expect(() => validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod([] as any)).toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError has stable error code', () => {
|
|
try {
|
|
validateTokenEndpointAuthMethod('xyz');
|
|
throw new Error('should have thrown');
|
|
} catch (e: any) {
|
|
expect(e.code).toBe('invalid_token_endpoint_auth_method');
|
|
expect(e.name).toBe('InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// v0.41.3 — T2: registerClientManual tokenEndpointAuthMethod parameter
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('v0.41.3 registerClientManual tokenEndpointAuthMethod', () => {
|
|
test('omitted → confidential client with secret (back-compat)', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'v413-default-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.clientId).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret!).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('explicit client_secret_post → confidential client with secret', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'v413-csp-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read', [], 'default', undefined, 'client_secret_post',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('explicit client_secret_basic → confidential client with secret', async () => {
|
|
const result = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'v413-csb-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read', [], 'default', undefined, 'client_secret_basic',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('"none" → public client with NO secret (T2 atomic INSERT)', async () => {
|
|
// The pre-v0.41.3 admin endpoint did INSERT (confidential) → UPDATE
|
|
// (NULL out secret_hash) for the 'none' case, leaving a confidential
|
|
// row stranded if the UPDATE failed (codex F4). T2 moves this into
|
|
// registerClientManual itself as a single atomic INSERT.
|
|
const result = await provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'v413-public-test', ['authorization_code'], 'read',
|
|
['https://example.test/cb'], 'default', undefined, 'none',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.clientId).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(result.clientSecret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
// Verify the stored row has client_secret_hash = NULL (public client shape)
|
|
const client = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(result.clientId);
|
|
expect(client).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(client!.client_secret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(client!.token_endpoint_auth_method).toBe('none');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('unknown auth method throws InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError at registration boundary', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.registerClientManual(
|
|
'v413-bad-test', ['client_credentials'], 'read', [], 'default', undefined, 'frobnicate',
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// v0.41.3 — T5: DCR /register handler applies the same validator
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('v0.41.3 DCR validator (T5)', () => {
|
|
test('DCR rejects unknown token_endpoint_auth_method — closes --enable-dcr loose path', async () => {
|
|
// Pre-v0.41.3 the DCR registration handler defaulted to 'client_secret_post'
|
|
// for any unknown value, silently swallowing typos. T5 throws so the bad
|
|
// input fails loud — same gate as CLI + admin paths.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'dcr-bad-test',
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.test/cb'],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'frobnicate',
|
|
} as any),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(InvalidTokenEndpointAuthMethodError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('DCR accepts "none" → public PKCE client', async () => {
|
|
const reg = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'dcr-public-test',
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.test/cb'],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'none',
|
|
} as any);
|
|
expect(reg.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
// RFC 7591 §3.2.1: public clients MUST NOT receive a client_secret
|
|
expect(reg.client_secret).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('DCR accepts "client_secret_basic" — codex F3 regression', async () => {
|
|
const reg = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'dcr-basic-test',
|
|
grant_types: ['authorization_code'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.test/cb'],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_basic',
|
|
} as any);
|
|
expect(reg.client_id).toStartWith('gbrain_cl_');
|
|
expect(reg.client_secret).toStartWith('gbrain_cs_');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('#1353 DCR default-grant hardening', () => {
|
|
test('DCR rejects explicit client_credentials by default', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'cc-default-test',
|
|
grant_types: ['client_credentials'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: [],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
} as any),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(InvalidClientMetadataError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('DCR defaults to authorization_code when grant_types unspecified', async () => {
|
|
const reg = await provider.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'no-grant-test',
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: ['https://example.test/cb'],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'none',
|
|
} as any);
|
|
const stored = await provider.clientsStore.getClient(reg.client_id);
|
|
expect(stored?.grant_types).toEqual(['authorization_code']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('--enable-dcr-insecure (allowClientCredentialsDcr) permits client_credentials', async () => {
|
|
const insecure = new GBrainOAuthProvider({ sql, allowClientCredentialsDcr: true });
|
|
const reg = await insecure.clientsStore.registerClient!({
|
|
client_name: 'cc-allowed-test',
|
|
grant_types: ['client_credentials'],
|
|
scope: 'read',
|
|
redirect_uris: [],
|
|
token_endpoint_auth_method: 'client_secret_post',
|
|
} as any);
|
|
const stored = await insecure.clientsStore.getClient(reg.client_id);
|
|
expect(stored?.grant_types).toEqual(['client_credentials']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|