Files
gbrain/docs/benchmarks
Garry Tan 679a3f9a3c docs(bench): 2026-04-19 gbrain v0.11.1 vs v0.12.1 regression comparison
Runs the same eval harness against two gbrain src/ trees on the same
240-page corpus and 145 queries. Patches the v0.11 copy's gbrain-after
adapter to use getLinks/getBacklinks (v0.11 has no traversePaths)
with identical direction+linkType semantics.

gbrain-after P@5 22.1% -> 49.1% (+27 pts); R@5 54.6% -> 97.9% (+43
pts); correct-in-top-5 99 -> 248 (+149). hybrid-nograph flat at 17.8%
/ 65.1% on both (v0.12 didn't touch hybridSearch / chunking).

Driver is extraction quality, not graph presence: v0.12 emits 499
typed links (v0.11: 136, x3.7) and 2,208 timeline entries (v0.11: 27,
x82) on the same 240 pages. Sharpens the April-18 "graph layer does
the work" claim -- on v0.11 that architecture only beat hybrid-nograph
by 4.3 points; the 31-point lead in the multi-adapter scorecard comes
from graph + high-quality extract in combination.
2026-04-19 08:34:28 +08:00
..